The Culture of Nepotism in Bureaucratic Recruitment Through Legal Sociology Analysis

Authors

  • Arief Fahmi Lubis Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Latifa Dinar Rahmani Hakim Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Reza Firmansyah University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  • Ahmad Taufiq Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65586/jpr.v2i1.59

Keywords:

Bureaucracy, Nepotism, Social Phenomena, Socio-legal, Transformative

Abstract

The practice of nepotism persists as a social phenomenon that reflects the fundamental tension between the impersonal logic of state law and the structures of family solidarity and patronage networks that remain deeply rooted in Indonesian social culture. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of how a culture of nepotism is formed and maintained within the bureaucratic recruitment process in Indonesia, through the lens of legal sociology. This study employs a qualitative, socio-legal research design focused on legal-sociological analysis to gain a deep understanding of how the culture of nepotism is formed, reproduced, and legitimised in bureaucratic recruitment practices in Indonesia. The findings confirm that the problem of nepotism lies not only in the weak enforcement of rules, but in the mismatch between the design of state institutions and the collectivist cultural structure of society. Consequently, efforts at bureaucratic reform that rely solely on anti-nepotism regulations are likely to fail unless accompanied by a transformation of power relations and a more equitable distribution of social access. Therefore, a shift in perspective is required: from a moralistic approach that merely condemns nepotism towards a structural approach that seeks to understand and redesign bureaucratic institutions so that they can bridge the demands of meritocracy with the social realities of society.

References

Bandiera, A., Larreguy, H., & Mangonnet, J. (2025). Family ties, social control, and authoritarian distribution to elites. American Political Science Review, 120(1), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055425000231

Bhattarai, G. (2025). Nepotism in ambassadorial appointments. In Nepal’s power elites: Rajahs, Ranas and Republic (pp. 435–459). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62458-2_9

Bischoff, C. S. (2023). Between a rock and a hard place: Balancing the duties of political responsiveness and legality in the civil service. Public Administration, 101(4), 1481–1502. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12898

Bote, R., Wang, T., & Genet, C. (2024). You say social agenda, I say my job: Navigating moral ambiguities by frontline workers in a social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 192(2), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05526-6

Butt, S., & Murharjanti, P. (2022). What constitutes compliance? Legislative responses to Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014

Chohan, U. W. (2023). Legislative oversight of bureaucracy. In Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 7612–7616). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_698

Damanik, E. L. (2022). Reaching out and institutionalizing multiple kinship relationships in the social environment: Ampangnaopat among Simalungunese, Indonesia. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 32(6), 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2021.1968558

de Avila Gomide, A. (2022). Democracy and bureaucracy in newly industrialized countries: A systematic comparison between Latin America and East Asia. Governance, 35(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12572

Fan, Z., & Ma, L. (2024). E-government, anticorruption, and citizens’ use of personal connections: evidence from Chinese municipalities. Journal of Chinese Governance, 9(3), 372–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2024.2352912

Hahn, J. (2022). Law Through the Lens of Sociology. In Foundations of a Sociology of Canon Law (pp. 29–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01791-9_2

Hasan, M. F. (2025). Educational authority and regulatory legitimacy: comparing normative systems in pesantren and public schools in Indonesia. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2025.2556586

Hassan, M., Larreguy, H., & Russell, S. (2024). Who gets hired? Political patronage and bureaucratic favoritism. American Political Science Review, 118(4), 1913–1930. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001338

Jancsics, D. (2025). Family Corruption: Relatives in Corrupt Transactions. Sociology Compass, 19(11), e70134. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70134

Johnson, T., & Dandeker, C. (2024). Patronage: relation and system. In Patronage in ancient society (pp. 219–242). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003483533-12

Kamsi, K., Julianto, V., & Karimullah, S. S. (2023). Intentionally Changing Everything: Deliberate Constructing in Corruption Case. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(2), 449–488. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.59866

Karimullah, S. S. (2024a). Family First or Business First? Balancing Family and Business Interests in an Islamic Economic Perspective. Al-Hijrah: Journal of Islamic Economics And Banking, 2(2), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.55062/al-hijrah.v2i2.669

Karimullah, S. S. (2024b). The Role of Law Enforcement Officials: The Dilemma Between Professionalism and Political Interests. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 13(2), 365–392. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.365-392

Karimullah, S. S., Akbar, M. A. A. Q. M., Qhuraissy, A., Irawan, F., Sunatar, B. S. B., & Sugiharto, A. B. S. A. B. (2025). Pancasila Economy: Forgotten Dream or Weapon Against Inequality? Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 13(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v13i1.1023

Keim-Klärner, S., Adebahr, P., Brandt, S., Gamper, M., Klärner, A., Knabe, A., Kupfer, A., Müller, B., Reis, O., & Vonneilich, N. (2023). Social inequality, social networks, and health: a scoping review of research on health inequalities from a social network perspective. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01876-9

Kolberg‐Shah, D., & Shin, H. (2024). Can corruption connect you to politics? Nepotism, anxiety, and government blame. Political Psychology, 45(5), 871–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12980

Lopes, A. V., & Vieira, D. M. (2023). Between politics and bureaucracy: a systematic literature review on the dynamics of public appointments. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2022-0200

Menjívar, C. (2023). State categories, bureaucracies of displacement, and possibilities from the margins. American Sociological Review, 88(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224221145727

Murthi, N. W., Taufiq, I., Yee, E., & Aktaniensia, N. A. (2025). Indonesia’s Inclusive Economic Diplomacy Based on the Pancasila Ideology. Jurnal Pelita Raya, 1(3), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.65586/jpr.v1i3.30

Nittrouer, C. L., Arena Jr, D., Silver, E. R., Avery, D. R., & Hebl, M. R. (2025). Despite the haters: The immense promise and progress of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(1), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2835

Nurizka, M. S., Jamil, M. S., & Sholeh, B. (2025). Analysis of the Impact of Sharia Regulations on Halal Trade in Southeast Asia. Jurnal Lentera Insani, 1(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.65586/jli.v1i1.16

Oliveira, E., Abner, G., Lee, S., Suzuki, K., Hur, H., & Perry, J. L. (2024). What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and government performance? Public Administration, 102(2), 668–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12945

Olszowski, R. (2024). Opening policymaking. In Collective intelligence in open policymaking (pp. 1–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58191-5_1

Panagopoulou, F., Parpoula, C., & Karpouzis, K. (2025). Legal perspectives on AI and the right to digital literacy in education. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7, 1692268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1692268

Poocharoen, O., & Brillantes, A. (2013). Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: Status, issues, and challenges. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(2), 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x13484829

Rahmat, B., Hartanto, B., & Hilman, A. (2024). Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia: From “Public Administration" to" Public Management". Journal of Local Government Issues, 7(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v7i2.33848

Rembulan, C., Maghfur, I. R., Siregar, M. A. H., Jakfar, M. A., & Solehah, S. (2025). The Impact of the Digital Economy on Economic Empowerment Models for Muslim Youth in Indonesia. Jurnal Lentera Insani, 1(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.65586/jli.v1i1.17

Rohman, N., Pathurrahman, & Mahpudin. (2025). Recruitment of village officials in decentralized Indonesia: national policy, local accommodation and resistance. South East Asia Research, 33(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2025.2483180

Schilpzand, P., Lagios, C., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2025). Family first: An integrative conceptual review of nepotism in organizations. Human Resource Management, 64(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22253

Sidani, Y. M., & Thornberry, J. (2013). Nepotism in the Arab world: An institutional theory perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20132313

Siemoneit, A. (2023). Merit first, need and equality second: hierarchies of justice. International Review of Economics, 70(4), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-023-00430-x

Suyahman, S., Karimullah, S. S., & Syahril, M. A. F. (2025). Intersectionality in Social Justice: Unpacking the Complexity of Oppression. Jambura Law Review, 7(1), 275–308. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1.27828

Syah, A. F., & Susilo, S. R. T. (2025). Strengthening the Merit System in Accelerating Bureaucratic Reform in Tangerang Regency. KnE Social Sciences, 10(15), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i15.19151

Theodorsson, U., Gudlaugsson, T., & Gudmundsdottir, S. (2025). Birds of a feather flock together: organizational nepotism and cronyism in Nordic banks. Journal of East-West Business, 31(1), 86–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2024.2415021

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301

Vikalista, E., Warsono, H., Martini, R., Erowati, D., & Muharam, R. S. (2026). Elite-centered regimes as barriers to meritocracy: the case of Indonesia. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1687026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1687026

Wang, Y., Dong, H., Dai, J., & Li, J. (2025). The third path to bridging the enforcement gap: leveraging social networks as instruments for shaping central-local dynamics. Public Performance & Management Review, 48(5), 1211–1233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2519606

Weißmüller, K. S., & Zuber, A. (2023). Understanding the micro‐foundations of administrative corruption in the public sector: Findings from a systematic literature review. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1704–1726. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13699

Wijaya, A. F., Wike, W., & Novita, A. A. (2023). Indonesian public administration: past, present, and future. In Handbook on Asian public administration (pp. 214–223). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104794.00022

Yulianto, J. E., & Lestari, M. D. (n.d.). Inter-ethnic Relationships and Marriages in Indonesia: Family Dynamics and Well-Being. In The Routledge International Handbook of Interracial and Intercultural Relationships and Mental Health (pp. 233–244). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003385547-22

Downloads

Published

2026-04-03

How to Cite

Arief Fahmi Lubis, Latifa Dinar Rahmani Hakim, Reza Firmansyah, & Ahmad Taufiq. (2026). The Culture of Nepotism in Bureaucratic Recruitment Through Legal Sociology Analysis. Jurnal Pelita Raya, 2(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.65586/jpr.v2i1.59